Welcome to the February 23rd planning commissioning meeting. If all commissioners would please mute their microphones until your turn to speak, that would be greatly appreciated. Members of the public may join using a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone, or Android device. Members of the public can access the meeting online at the city's website and the public can ask questions and comments during the meeting by using the link to the virtual meeting to join and then submitting the questions via the online question and answer feature within the meeting. Questions regarding this meeting can also be asked during regular business hours at city hall. If you are a member of the public and wish to speak on a topic, please fill out one of the yellow forms at the back of the room and provide that sheet to staff. You will be called on after the project in question is presented. Residents viewing online, please add your questions to the Q&A field along with your name and address. And with that, we will call the meeting to order. Staff, will you please start the roll call? >> Thank you, Chair Saen Shaw, >> present. >> John Colum, Stephanie Swanson, >> here. >> Shay Cabbrooks. >> Jim Gentiel >> here. >> Jacob Guzik >> here. Jazelle Parnell, Rien Hole >> here. >> Chair, we have a quorum. Okay. >> The first item on our agenda is project 05-2025-0000594. It is the Beenberg Drive multifamily project and the staff member presenting will be Eric. Take it away. >> Thank you, Chair. Greco Properties has submitted an application for a comprehensive plan amendment, a resoning, a planned unit development, conditional use permit, and preliminary plat and site and building plan for a 150 unit multifamily project. That project includes both an apartment and town home uses. The property is located on the west side of Beenburg Drive uh north of Tamarak Road within the Gold Line development. The Gold Line development was approved in 2024 and identified the first phase which has the now open Topgolf facility which would be to the south of this application south and west. The main event which is currently under construction that's a Dave and Busters own commercial recreation use that is scheduled to open this late summer or early fall. And then as you can see on the screen, the proposed residential use in the general uh center of the site. >> The screen working >> should anything now? >> No. >> I just have to turn them on. Yeah, they could just not be on. >> Got it. >> We're good. Yep. Jackpot. >> Right. Uh the uses in front of you this evening is includes a active 55 plus senior with 137 units within a four-story apartment building. and then uh also includes a uh number of town homes within uh two separate buildings. An application is in front of you this evening for a comprehensive plan amendment. The applicant has requested to change the land use from places to work to mixuse. The city has historically used the findings of fact shown on the screen for decision-making purposes. One of those two is either a mistake was made in designated the property in this case as places to work in the comprehensive plan or the other area would be times and conditions have changed to warrant a change in the land use or comprehensive plan. Staff identifies that in this case the times and conditions have changed to warrant a change in the comp plan. In April of 2022, the city council approved the Gold Line station area master plan. The purpose of that master plan was to to determine the appropriate land uses within the three stations uh that serve Woodbury and provide the development patterns and in this case it did identify the residential use for this property. The master plan also contemplated this future uh comprehensive plan amendment that was identified would occur with a development application. Also in front of you this evening is a PUD for the parking. This is been an item that has occurred fairly frequently as part of multifamily review. The standards within the zoning code identify a requirement that would require 274 spaces. The applicant has requested to construct 254 spaces. 180 of those spaces would be underground within an underground parking area. and then 37 parking spaces for uh the surface parking area. As stated within the staff report, staff has done a significant amount of research uh on parking ratios and is comfortable with the modification to move our parking ratios from a per unit to a bedroom count. And that's what's in front of the planning commission this evening. As we take a look at the site access, access is provided by two access points off of Beanberg Drive. Those are both existing access points that have been constructed. The proposed building comes with a number of exterior and interior amenities. The exterior amenities include a pickle ball, swimming pool, gathering spaces, some garden boxes, fire pits, and an outdoor kitchen. The interior uses include a community room, yoga studio, fitness center, golf simulator, hobby room, uh a cafe, li uh library use, a pet wash, and other community spaces. A landscaping plan has been submitted which identifies a significant amount of landscaping to soften the impacts of the proposed multifamily development. You will note some lighter plantings along Beenberg Drive. that is due to the presence of the uh pipeline that is uh runs along uh Beimber Drive. So foundation plantings will be identified closer to the building in those locations due to restrictions due to the pipeline. As we take a look at the architecture, we'll identify that the building does meet the architectural requirements of the ordinance which is 65% glass class one which includes brick, glass or stone. The proposed materials were carefully selected to complement the adjacent community commercial uses. The apartment design uh jogs the building facade and has natural transitions to break the building massing into smaller visual visually approachable parts. As you can see on the screen, the top left graphic is the view from Billenberg Drive. The bottom left graphic is the main entrance is really on the north side of the building. On the right hand side of the screen is the townhouse elevations. Those are designed to complement the apartment uses as well as the surrounding commercial uses. As we take a look at the pedestrian movements for the project, the area on the left hand side is from the Gold Line development. You'll see the dashed red line on the screen. that was anticipated to be constructed as part of the future development. And on the right hand side, you can see the presence of that sidewalk and how those connections are then made into the development area from that sidewalk as well as the significant number of internal sidewalks that are proposed by the development. This air photo shows it a little bit differently. So you can see the pedestrian connectivity that's proposed not only through the corridor but also internal to the site. With that, staff recommends Oh, a neighborhood meeting was held on February 17th. No residents were in attendance. Important to note that did occur. And with that, staff recommends approval of the comprehensive plan amendment resoning planning unit development conditional use permit plat site plan for the Billberg Drive multif family. The applicant is on hand for questions. >> Would the applicant like to add anything? >> Good evening, Josh Brandstead. uh president, owner of Greco at 607 Washington Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Uh thank you very much for having us here. Uh this has been our project long in the works. I think as as many of you know, um Eric and team have been just fantastic to work with. Uh this is actually the second 55 plus project we would be doing here in the Twin Cities um at this point in time. Then we have a third one that's in planning in another in another city as well here. So we're we're very excited. We've learned a lot from our first one that we think we've implemented here uh that we think um you know joins this project to help be successful. Um but we do you know by all means look forward to feedback this evening too. Thank you. >> Have there been any yellow slips? >> Not at this time chair. >> Okay. The Q&A will stay open for the duration of the project discussion. Um, please enter any questions and staff will read them for the commission. And so now we're going to open it up to members of the planning commission for questions. And we are going to switch things up today because it's fun. And normally our student commissioners never get to ask questions because they all get asked. So today we are going to start with commissioner Hille >> and I talked to her first. This is not her being blindsided. >> Yep. It's not it's not out of nowhere. Um, I would say if there is any questions, I'll be like, is there any accommodations for any like older trees to be preserved at all around the area? >> The area uh was masqueraded as part of the gold line development. So, the trees that were on site had been previously removed. There was some pre tree preservation areas along the northern portion of the site that were preserved as part of the overall property redevelopment as well as trees on the southern portion um just south of Top Gulf. But within the pad that's being proposed here, that area has been uh mass graded already. >> Oh uh yeah, that kind of answered my question. Thank you. >> Did you have any other questions? >> Oh, I know I haven't. >> All right. Thank you, Commissioner Sha. >> Thank you, Chair. Um, so I had uh a question maybe first to start with city. Um so you know given the nature of the proposal and what is being asked um there's several things being asked right you know from comprehensive plan amendment resoning so on so forth conditional use permit I'm just curious as in do we have a history of actually any prior projects that actually looked for approval on so many different things? Yeah, this I would say this is a fairly um standard set of development review items that are necessary for a uh multifamily project. So really any multifamily project is going to require usually a planned unit development for some level of of flexibility. The conditional use permit then comes with that both from the implementing the planned unit development but also from the multifamily aspect. The plenary plaid is in front of you this evening. that's fairly standard as well as a site and building plan. The uniqueness here is the comprehensive plan amendment and the reasonzoning that follows with that. Those are the two of the items that are a little more infrequent, but as identified within the presentation that was really um anticipated as part of the gold line master plan creation. um that the the implementation steps of the master plan identified a future comp plan amendment and resoning action to uh allow the residential uses within this area. >> So yeah, my my question was specifically for the resoning. So So that you're saying is because as you explained in in your assessment, it's part of the gold line and and you know what was actually done originally and what you are asking for. >> That's correct. >> Thank you. Um the second question and maybe it's covered you know more details somewhere else but um there is actually this uh you know pedestrian infrastructure improvements which have been mentioned there um and and yeah that that there so that the red dotted path is actually included as part of what the developer would need to put in place. Correct. >> That is correct. and and it actually joins with the blue part which is actually you know further south of it. Is that my understanding? >> That is also correct. >> Okay. And thank you. And and then regarding the um existing access points from Billenberg, uh it actually says um on page four of 13 that it's actually going to be um will be signalized access. Uh it's not currently signalized. Correct. >> Both the access points are currently signalized access points. >> Okay. So they're just using the existing access points. Okay, >> that is correct. >> Thank you. And maybe one more and I think we covered that. That was pedestrian uh piece. So, thank you very much, >> Commissioner Kennedy. >> Thank you, Chair. Um, on page 10 of the staff report, uh, number five, just a couple of questions from the staff report talks about how the applicant will maintain the private road connection. Um my thought is if there's a new owner down the road is that going to still apply to the that owner and so that that's several answer to several questions. >> Yeah. Within the conditions of approval where the term applicant the the condition of use permit will be required will be recorded against the property. So that will uh be a condition that um continues on into the future. >> I figured that but I wasn't sure. So thank you. And that's the same for number 11. Um the snow removal, maintenance, replacement of all maintain of all of the trails, etc. >> That is correct. >> Okay. Thank you. Um on um the path uh two other questions actually. Um is I didn't see a path from the town homes to the main buildings where the common activities are located. Is that um in the works? Is that a thought? um if they want to and my thought is if there um easy access accessibility from the town homes to the areas in the main area. >> Thank you uh Commissioner Kennedy for that. Um we do I I'm not sure sure sure sure that it exactly depicts it here in the uh site plan but the intention is yes to have direct access to the larger building for those residents to go use amenities and access the different events that will be going on there as well but and also to have accessible paths >> and so where if I may follow up where um in the circle would that lead directly over to with a paved path? >> Correct. Yeah. So, more than likely is where it would come in is where you see the turn through the town home area where it comes to a point at the top there. That'd be the natural access point back to that sidewalk. That's what I fig both paths around the pickle ball courts. >> Yeah. Yes. Um wide enough for a wheelchair or two. >> Correct. >> Good. Um the followup to that also I didn't the handicap parking spots um uh I didn't locate those very well apparently. >> Yeah. So, we have a couple different locations. We will have approximately four of them right at the main entrance of the apartment building. Uh there will also be uh required handicap parking stalls in the in the garage of the uh apartment building as well. And then any type of requirements for the town homes would be found in the the guest uh surface areas as well. Okay. >> Now, each town home does have enough depth in it to have two cars parked in front of that town home as well. >> Yeah. Because those are basically private homes. Correct. >> And these are purchased units, not rented. >> They will all be rental. >> Okay. >> They will all be rental, >> including the town homes. >> Correct. >> Okay. All right. Um and then one more question. Yeah. >> Page 32. Um uh number 32 on page 12. >> Didn't know you'd written 32 pages, did you? >> Yeah. Um uh number number 32 and then item six in within that the EPA water sense smart controllers. They sounded so cool I had to ask about them. >> Yeah, smart controllers. So essentially what they allow us to do is to pre-program um any type of of use with that device. So we can do it remotely. Um it can also be controlled through a Bluetooth connection. Uh so ultimately allows for flexibility and control. >> The smart sense controllers also have capabilities of reading uh the weather patterns and um altering their amount of watering that's occurring based on future weather patterns. >> So they wouldn't look out and while it was raining cats and dogs see the water. Correct. Oh, that's wonderful. >> That's really good. All right. >> Those are all the questions I had. Sure. >> Commissioner Guzzik. >> Thank you, Chair. Um, first question has to be for the developer. Um, with the proposed 254 stalls, you feel that's more than enough. >> Yeah, we do. We were actually running the math on that in the office when we initially um were concepting the plan and then we took some updated numbers from our project in Minnetonka called Ensley, which is a 121 unit 55 plus project. So there right now um on our in this practice a little over 50% leased at this point. It opens here in June but to date about 67 stalls per bedroom have been uh reserved in that project. And so we added an inflator on here. So we we said you know if 75 of the occupants here reserve a stall on a perbedroom basis. That's really the that's always been the math test that we've found through our operations. Um, you know, we've been operating apartment buildings since 2007 here in the Twin Cities, and we found that per bedroom metric is really the key to the success of these projects. So, we we did we ran the numbers at a point 75 uh rate, which is about 10% higher than what we're seeing in Minnotonka right now. And uh you know, we total out to 188 total stalls for the project. Well, we have that in our underground garage. We have another 43 at the surface level. And then we have the 38 that we have um underneath agreement with the uh adjacent uh lot as well. So I think the long and the short of it is is that we'll be able to park all of our residents underneath and we'll have almost 90 stalls to um handle any type of uh guests and vendors that visit the the project as well. Okay. >> Um and then I guess question for staff in general. Um I noticed um we mentioned that you've reviewed some parking utilization elsewhere in the city. Is is there talks of updating the city ordinance? >> Yeah, I think that is something that when as we look at our next zoning ordinance update, we'll look to likely adopt more of a bedroom count approach versus the two per. There's been a fair amount of dialogue at the legislature regarding this. So, that's one of the reasons we have not spent the time to update. As we are entering or now in the 2026 legislative cycle, we'll see if there are statewide modifications to parking requirements. >> Uh, I guess another question for staff would be, so we're reszoning to mixed use. Is it normal to have like so just this parcel is I guess technically single use. Is it normal to have that mixeduse designation, not have a sort of vertical integration of the mixed use >> within our code? It identifies either vertical or horizontal mixed use. So the thought process is because of the surrounding commercial development within you've really created and this graphic does a good job kind of identifying the mixeduse nature of the gold line development. >> And the the lot that we're reszoning is just the lot where this building's >> That is correct. >> Okay. >> Did the other the Top Golf or the other parcels need to go through a resoning? >> They did not. >> Okay. That's just because they met the code that is on. Okay. Correct. >> There's no further questions from each chair. >> Commissioner Gentiel. >> Thank you, Chair. I guess while you're standing, um driving by the site today, um the group has left you a large pile of dirt on site. Just making sure that you're aware of your uh either balanced site or non-balanced site and some export that may or may not need to happen. >> Yeah. So they'll actually be delivering the site that that soil is left there to searchcharge the soils that are uh in place today. Okay. So that um that soil will actually be removed prior to us uh taking over the site. >> Oh, very nice. Great. Um parking seems to be a theme here. So we'll stay on that one for a second. I know on page four it talks about that equation, right? The stalls per space. And then you had al also mentioned the agreement that you have. Mhm. >> Um is that anything that we need to keep track of as that grows or are we okay with just having that agreement in place for this? >> Yeah, the as part of the conditions of approval, it does identify that they need to have the parking uh spaces um and then the proof of parking. So that's in condition of approval number four that does kind of contemplate to make sure that that's into perpetuity. >> Got it. Uh, and then jumping to page 11 for staff. Then you're probably wrote this, but you're probably okay with the definition of the additional items needed for the walk path, push buttons, and timing. >> Great. >> Yeah, we could certainly if the commissioners wanted to add more clarity, I I am comfortable with that as it will ultimately be also layered into a a builder or developer agreement that we will likely be more descriptive in. >> Okay. No, totally fine for me. Um, I guess if you could go to the aerial photo for me really quick. More of just a question or a thought about um, Commissioner Kennedy's comment where you're potentially adding the new pathway for the town home access. I'm just looking at maybe potentially EMS access to the pool, >> maybe going to the main address of the duplex and how we're maybe defining the address with EMS services. >> As you look at the maze, if you come in through the front lobby, it might take a minute to get to the pool. Also just looking at how we would address, no pun intended, the access to the pool with EMS. >> Yep. Yeah, I think there's two different options. So, one, to your point, through the town home area, there's also access available through that parking lot to the south as well. I think that's one area that we uh talked a lot about from the fire access and whatnot. Um, but when we when we looked at the distance runs from the town home turnaround area, you know, we were able to get underneath of that 150 feet for hose lengths and whatnot, but then for ambulatory um access to your point, you know, they could come in through the front access to uh take people out, but then there would also be an alternative. So, when we make that connection point from the town homes, I think, you know, we we'll need to be mindful of that and equipment and what that could look like in the event there was a an issue. >> Perfect. Yeah. just not understanding if they if they go to the main address, it's a maze to get to the pool. Yes. >> Just as a background, our EMS teams for all of our multif family do does a fair amount of training of the individual facilities. Both fire and EMS do pretty regularly um go to those sites well in advance of the emergency situation to familiarize yourself because of the challenges that you're identifying. >> No, no further questions. Sure. Thank you. >> All right. I just got a couple for you. Um, first of all, I think the the parking flexibility makes a lot of sense, especially considering it's a senior living center. I really like that you did all these walking paths. Uh, I got to tell you, I've been sitting up here for two years and some changed and driving Eric crazy talking about color. And if you are going to do a black, white, beige, glass box, I think this is the way to do it. I really love the cantalvered roof lines. I especially appreciate that you have both evergreens and deciduous trees because we do live in a place where the sun likes to hide for days, weeks, months at a time and everything falls down and it's nice to have an evergreen tree with some color. And I just want to make sure this view from the main entrance we're looking at here. Are you teasing me with this yellow sculpture over here? That may not be the piece, but yeah, we do have an intention of putting a big large display of art there. >> It will not be black, white, beige, or glass. >> No, it won't. It'll be some type of a >> fantastic. Thank you for doing that. >> And then I got some questions on the conditions. With condition number four on page 10, have we already identified where additional parking would go if it's needed? Yeah, the proof of parking areas are generally within this location right here. >> Condition 12, a maximum of 150 residential units shall be permitted for the project. I just wasn't sure why we needed that. If there's 150 in the project description, >> the uh just to be very clear on any sort of future modifications, we've had situations in the past on apartment uses where they've changed uh a three-bedroom unit and tried to move that into two one-bedroom units just because of the size of difference in allocation. So, we just want to be really clear that the maximum numbers. >> Okay. And then on condition 15, uh, quick typo. It's a period and it's I think it's supposed to be a colon. >> Thank you. >> And that is all I have. >> Do we have any additional questions from any commissioners? >> I have one additional question. >> Go for it. Um more for staff I guess. Um if this is if 150 units is the maximum use for the horizontal, correct? Is there is there a possibility or would there have been an opportunity to add even more units if they were if there was a different configuration or is this kind of the maxing out the space that's that's there? >> This is the maximum amount unless there was a density bonus that was qualified for. So there could have been a density bonus for providing of affordable housing for greenway corridors or sustainable design. You could have seen additional units built that way. But under the maximums of the comp plan mixeduse designation, 15 units per acre is the max. >> Okay. Thank you. >> Oh, I have one last question for staff. Why are we reszoning to mixed use instead of residential if we are only looking at residential uses on the lot? uh ultimately for flexibility in the future if there was some future redevelopment to add commercial within the location. It would be set up for that use. >> Okay. Do we get any more questions from the public on this one? >> Not at this time, chair. >> All right. So, staff will be looking for a recommendation on the project. I can't do it today. I move to approve um project number 05202500594 um for the Beenberg Drive multif family project. >> Do we have a second? I and I would second it with um number 15. Add the details um on the striping and the push button installation, signal timing, so on so forth for the pedestrian infrastructure. >> Do we technically need a new motion? >> I think we can we should do a new motion. Yes. >> Would you like to redo your motion edits to >> I would like 15? >> Yes, I would like to. Um, I move to approve the Beenberg Drive multif family project number 05202500594 with conditions as outlined in the staff report with the addition to number 15 as stated. >> Do we have another second? >> Yep. I second it. >> All in favor say I. >> I. >> Any oppose say nay. >> All right. Congratulations. And Eric, when will this go to council? >> Uh March 11th. Is that Wednesday? >> March 11th. >> All right. It will >> it will go to city council sometime around March 11th. It's a Wednesday. >> Thank you very much. All right. Next we are going to be hearing about 47 Pines project number 29-2025-0000592 and again Eric is at the helm. Take it away. >> Thank you again chair Land and Resources Consulting or LRC has submitted an application for another comp plan amendment planning and development conditional use permit preliminary plat for the property located at 4255 Woodlane Drive. This application includes the request to plat nine residential units and the property is currently zoned R2 single family estate district and is currently guided as rural estate on the land use plan. This application has been in front of the planning commission in the past in July of last year. That was looked at as a concept PUD to look at the overall layout and get initial feedback from both planning commission and city council in advance of a full development application. The application in front of you this evening was informed by that process. The property is zoned R2 single family estate district which normally would I be a one unit per 3 acre density due to the area being served by private well and private septic versus public infrastructure. In this case, the application in front of you this evening would be connected to city sewer and water and therefore through the PUD process is requesting a modification to the minimum lot size. As stated also in front of you is a amendment to the comprehensive plan. Like the last application, we use those two findings of fact. either a mistake was made in this case get designating the property as rural estate or that times and conditions have changed since the 2040 comprehensive plan was adopted. Much like the last application, this is again staff has identified that the times and conditions have changed due to the development of the property to the east, the Arbor Ridge development, and really more importantly due to the city constructing a municipal drinking water supply well on the property to the east uh where the red arrow is pointing to. Due to the presence of that drinking water supply plant, it is uh a best practice to limit additional protrusions into the aquifer in close proximity to that area. So in this case, the rationale for that change is to protect the overall groundwater and the city's drinking water supply by rather than by right allowing traditional R2 residential development, which would be the 3acre minimum lot size with multiple private wells being developed on this site. Instead, increase the density and require utilization of city sewer and water, but not to the level of full urban development like the property to the east. As shown in the planning commission staff report, the applicant is requesting a minimum lot size of 74 acres. Uh it is important to note from a context standpoint. The property to the east, which is the Arbor Ridge development, those lot r those lot sizes range from 2 to 3 units per acre. So again, the application has 74. So quite a bit larger. The goal of this is to have that transition zone between the urban design and the more rural patterns on the west side of Woodlane Drive. The preliminary plat is shown on the screen and as stated previously, it's nine single family properties. One of those lots is an existing home which is located on lot one and also the construction of the storm water management system on out lot A. There's also dedication of right ofway for Woodlane Drive. The lot layout and pedestrian. The area kind of in reddish pink on the north side is the construction of a a path along the south side of Hargus Parkway that would ultimately terminate now at Wood Lane Drive. You'll also notice a purple sidewalk connection in this location. that is proposed in this location as this culde-sac is designed to be extended into the future into areas to the south if they were to develop in the future. So that would add pedestrian connection for that use. A detailed landscaping plan has been created as part of the development application. You'll see a presence of landscaping along Hargus Parkway as well as landscaping throughout the rest of the area. There is a condition of approval that requires additional rear yard trees or a total of three trees per lot to meet the code requirements as a condition of approval. Finally, the storm water management is handled in a two cell system in the southwest portion of the project area as shown by the blue arrow on the screen. A neighborhood meeting was held as part of the concept PUD process in June of 2025. A second neighborhood meeting was held in November uh no on November 17th, 2025 as part of this application. In that case, nine residents were in attendance. questions were related to timing of the project, some landscaping along Hargus, which did lead to some modifications to the landscaping plan, and then a request to address some of the existing barbed wire that is found on the site that's also been memorialized within the conditions of approval. And with that, staff recommends approval of the uh 47 Pines residential subdivision, and the applicant is on hand for questions. >> Would the applicant like to add anything? Thank you, Madam Chair. I'm Todd Olen. I'm with Landon Resource Consulting. I can't pass up an opportunity to talk. So, uh, can't really do a more compre comprehensive review than Eric did. He touched on all the details, but we're here for questions if you have them. This is very, very similar, if not almost identical, to what we saw back in June of uh, last year when we were presenting uh, a concept here that uh, is a little larger lots. These are all going to be custom homes. Um, we have a builder now partnered on the job on the project. So, we're excited to uh to see what they're going to come up for unique architecture on these. They're going to be high-end homes. And yeah, we're excited. So, >> all right. And I do have one yellow slip for this project. Do we get any more or do we have any questions on teams at this time? >> Not at this time, chair. >> Okay. Let's start with Greg Novak of 4460 Woodlane Drive. >> Hi. Our property is just to the south of this piece. So, it goes along the south border uh right there. It's about the same size property. And uh I would just comment I think this is a a nice plan because it's handling the transition from the higher density on the east and the lower density 3acre lots on the west side of Woodlane Drive. And it's also giving a good opportunity for uh our property and the property south of us if someday something would change then that could also be developed uh with the city sewer and water. Um the second thing I had is I just kind of want to reemphasize like I did in the neighborhood meeting that the the water drainage and water shed is very important to us because uh there's been problems with that in the past. We just want to make sure that all the engineering is good and works well. And then the last item is uh you know in the neighborhood meeting the developer proposed leaving the fence exactly where it's at. Uh which I thought was a great idea. However, the barb wire is not acceptable. So maybe we could leave the post and just put up a like a woven wire on those same posts or something just to kind of keep the same border cuz it's been the same border for our family for like 68 years since my parents bought the farm in 1958 and every neighbor previously we've all kind of agreed that's kind of where the border is. That's my only other comment. So thank you. >> Thank you. And with that, we're going to open it up to questions from our commissioners. And again, we are going to start with our student commissioner, Commissioner Alle. >> I was going to say something about um any flooding concerns, but I guess he talked about something about that, but I guess I don't have any further questions about this plan. All right. Thank you. We're going to switch it up again. Commissioner Gzik >> getting crazy. >> Thank you, Chair. >> Um I guess this is more for staff. I noticed um in the Arbor is Arbor Ridge or what's the development? There's that stub of a street just to the south. Yeah, right there. Was there was there any master plan for this area or or an idea of what would go there? I assume there might be something given that stub there, but there was not a master plan conducted as part of the development of the Arbor Ridge. The stub street there is to provide future access to the property to the south of this application. Currently, that property is zoned R2. uh it will um if this project moves forward would have uh city sewer and water stubbed to the property or in close proximity to the property. I would anticipate if this project were to be approved and moved forward and this site had municipal utilities that during the 2050 comprehensive plan process a analysis of the ultimate land use would be reviewed and then has um engineering reviewed it with I noticed because we have the sewer and water that's not in the road in Harcus Parkway on this one. Is that have they had a chance to review? Has that been a comment at all? >> Yes, this has been fully reviewed by our engineering group uh including the locations of the proposed utilities >> in the boulevard. >> Questions. >> Where am I going to go? Where am I going to go? Commissioner Shaw. >> Thank you, Chair. Um I had uh few questions. Um um maybe one for start with the staff is probably where this question would be. if you can put up that uh graph that shows the the new trail right along Hargus. Yeah, that that one. Um so there is already an existing walking path on the other side of Hargus. Correct. >> That is correct. On the north side >> and and and on the other side of Hargus Parkway is Bailey Elementary School, right? So I'm assuming that you know there will be if there are any kids who are actually going to Bailey Elementary from this neighborhood they' most likely be walking as compared to being bust right given it's right next to the school. So so it's great to have the walking path on both sides. Uh however you know my question and concern is uh crossing Hargus uh going to Bailey and how is that going to be provided for um so that there is there isn't any issue um you know for kids crossing across or anybody else who's actually crossing across. >> Yeah, our engineering team did look closely at that item uh due to the close proximity to the elementary school. This best practice is to locate crossings at uh intersections. So the crossing area would be at Wood Lane and >> um and Hargus and then also back further to the east uh in the Arbor Ridge development versus creating a what's called a midblock crossing. Yeah. And those midblock crossings have been shown to be less safe. >> So So that's great. So, so the one which would be on wood lane, would that actually be you know like lighted up uh crossing uh so that the cars actually are aware if someone's crossing or how is have you thought about that? >> At this point there is not a recommendation to have any sort of infrastructure that would indicate the flashing beacons. Um but that can be monitored and like many of our walk sheds to schools that will be monitored by our um engineering division. Um, also we would anticipate that the school district as they see an increase of walkers in the area, they would they routinely add personnel within that location as well. >> Okay. Thank you. So, so that'll be assessed and decided whether you do the lighted crossing. Okay. Um the next question is actually you know uh somewhat related to the previous question which is um not the pedestrian crossing but you know as we look at you know this change for this particular lot um and you know one of the neighbors actually talked about their lot being further south of it. uh how much water city water and sewer capacity exists at the current you know uh kind of location if the two other lots on the south side actually also went in the same direction. We have done preliminary analysis of our system designs and it does look like we will have capacity to service the areas to the south. However, the full verification of that is generally done through our full system analysis that occurs during the comp plan process. We are the comp plan is is underway at this point. We would anticipate having that analysis finalized sometime in 2027. >> Okay. Thank you. No further questions. Chair >> Commissioner Gentiel. >> Thank you, Chair. Uh I guess first question for staff. Who owns lot one? >> The property owners are in attendance. They have been the property owners for several decades. 39 years. >> Perfect. So, I think that'll solve a lot of the questions that you're aware of the infrastructure and utilities going to your property and the removal of the well and they are. Okay, great. >> Many conversations. >> Perfect. Um, I guess second questions for staff. Uh, page three, item three. It says that the south property line is the trees would be proposed to be preserved. Is there a reason that they're proposed to be preserved versus will be preserved? >> Uh, yeah, I think it's the same. They are the intent >> will be proposed. They they will be preserved. Yes. >> Okay. I can I can clean that up for the record either way. And then as part of the culde-sac design here for that allowing that future access they just thinking more of again back to that EMS conversation andor trash how that looks for forward approach versus backing out each time or how that trash service and EMS is going to happen. The size of that culde-sac is reviewed by our engineering division as well as our public works division to ensure that it is sized appropriately for the turning movements uh both on the interim side. So this is designed appropriately to allow for larger vehicles to turn around. >> Perfect. >> I hope you enjoy your new water pressure. No further questions. Chair >> Eric, do we need to have them come up to the podium and give their names and addresses? Uh if there's further questions of them I think we could but as of now I think for the minutes we can identify the okay >> from from my answers. >> Okay. Commissioner Kenny. >> Thank you chair. Um I also wanted to know who owns lot one. Um I wondered two things that might impact you. one um is what's the changeover from is it a large process the change over from the well um access to city utilities um do they have to move out for six months is what I was wondering and and how is that is this common >> it's it's not unusual um for parcels that are um retained during development to ultimately connect their systems um there is a period period of time where they do need to manage, but it is not anywhere close to a six-month timeline. It's probably a weekish time time frame depending on the effectiveness of their contractor. >> Okay. Thank you. I I was just worried about you. Um I did have a question about the current storm water problems. I know it's been mentioned. How significant is that and has that been? >> Talk about the problems. He's got a he lives there. Well, I think historically, uh, it kind of goes way back where the water would flow from our property, you know, from the neighbors to the south of us and then through the thie's property to the north and then out into used to be a corn field where the school is. And, uh, over the years there's been a couple of times where the elevations have changed, so the water like became more blocked. The last time I recall was when they built the school in 1991. the drain level was significantly higher than the water used to flow into the cornfield. So every time there was like a lot of rain in the spring or a big melt then like thie's backyard would be basically underwater almost you know past uh and you couldn't really drive through there or anything. So I think uh with good engineering that all be taken care of. It's just something that is important that we know that has been an issue in the past. I hope we can address. >> Thank you. Okay. Um, on page C3.4 under the deatering and basin draining, the fourth dash point says the contractor visually checks and photographs the discharge at least well every 24 hours at least once a a day. Um um I'm I'm sure that's normal, but is that um because of the expanse of this uh um project from you know from end to end? Um >> the the notes within the storm water prevention plan, pollution prevention plan are fairly standard um comments. >> Okay. And then two bullet points down from that, the oil water separator. Um I mean with the paving and things that are that's going to going to be going on. Um just generally um I'm sure that's normal, but how does that work? How do you >> actually uh thank you madam? First of all, um there won't be a oil water separator structure on this. There's a two s a two-step process for treating the water through the ponds. Uh one of them is a filtration basin where you're the water is required to go into the first pond and then filter through sand and then finds pipe and then goes to the next one which is the standing water static water uh which further dissipates energy lets sediment fall out and then is released into the direction or the structure that goes to the north. So there isn't a like like what you'd find in a restaurant oil water separator but through this process the oil water is separated. >> It's built into the structure. >> It is indeed. >> And in outlaw a it says filtration basin and then the pond. Is that what you're talking about? >> Exactly. Okay. Exactly. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. Um, and as far as trees on on page L1000, they have 1/2 inch replacement tree per 1 in significant tree removed. I I know that that um staff is very focused on trees, but I just wanted to know, don't we end up with a little fewer number um the property had than at the beginning? Um maybe they're more significant trees. I mean, I had a lot of reasons why that might be. If that's true, that's my question. >> Um, there's there's truth in that. There were back in 1991, there were significant a number of trees that were planted. Um, so they aren't the native growth there. So those don't need to be counted as far as being significant. Um, if you go I can you get to that uh preservation plan? >> I don't have that loaded. >> Oh, okay. Um, sorry. the we did identify all of the uh significant trees and then uh went by the rate that of replacement for those and we have the right number there as far as what what's required to be replaced. Now being custom homes I will say um the architect's going to take a specific look on every lot and look at sight lines and say well I want landscaping here and here and here. The unfortunate part of that is we don't have lots for them to look at yet. So, I can't put it on a plan to say they're going to be here and here and here. At the same time, we're going to be coordinating with the thieves because the biggest impact is really going to be that existing home there and what they're looking out their back window at now versus what they're going to look at later. So, if there are gaps or whatnot, that's specifically the sight lines we're going to be looking at. So, if we can rearrange or bunch them together better so they have better sight lines um and better sight lines from the proposed lots, we'll we'll be doing that. So, do the custom own the custom home buyers, owners, builders, um, have a choice as to where they want those trees on their properties or you're placing those. >> They'll >> Well, some of those will be placed along the along the road. >> They won't be along the road. The ones you see here now are going to be planted right where they're shown. >> Okay? >> The new builder or the custom home builder is going to come in and say, "Well, I want an extra tree here, here, here." Now, they they won't be allowed to put them on easements. they won't be allowed to put them in the rightway, >> but with with the exception of that where they want them on their yard or in their yard, they can put them there. >> So, there's some structure going in, which is good, I think. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Good. >> Okay. >> Thank >> Thank you. Um on the staff report, page six, just a few more questions. Number five, it says final park dedication. It's a niggling small point, but is it is it I there's not a park there. So, it's talking about the whole project. Is that right? >> So, there's two ways that park dedication occurs for subdivisions. Either a portion of the property is dedicated to the city for uh park use or a payment in lie is a occurs and in this case, condition number five is memorializing that it's a payment in lie. those payment uh per lot payments are established by city code and uh as part of the development agreement the applicant would pay the park dedication fee. >> Okay. To the city. >> That's correct. >> That was my other question. Okay. All right. And one last question. Um on page seven number 10 um and again I think you answered this previously. Who pays the landscaping maintenance after the three years? um would be would travel with the property. >> In this case, the outlot A will be deed to the city. So, the city will be doing the long-term maintenance on outlot A. And that's why it's critical to have a three-year maintenance. So, the storm water management will be publicly owned. >> Okay. Thank you. That's it from you, chair. Thank you. >> All right. And I just wanted to um scold the applicant a little bit because you are completely selling yourself short with the last time you were here. You were asking for I think it was three different zoning flexibilities and you're only asking for one here and it makes complete sense. So you're completely selling yourself short. Don't do that anymore. And I seem to remember a very wise planner recommending a Utah shape. And I do notice lot two is a Utah shape. So, I'm really glad that worked out for you. >> Wrote it down. >> I even wrote it down for you. Uh I think the uh the trail makes a lot of sense, especially with the school right across the street. And to ease Commissioner Shaw's uh mind about the crosswalks at my son's school, I noticed an issue and I contacted city staff and they were incredibly responsive and they gave me all kinds of information. Fix the problem right away. Don't worry about it. It's gonna be okay. >> Super. >> And I do not have any more questions. Did anybody else have any more questions while we were thinking about this? Did we get any more yellow slips? >> Not at this time, chair. >> All right. With that, we are looking for a motion. Who wants to do it? >> I move to approve the 47 Pines Woodbury. Um, oh heavens. Comprehensive plan amendment planned unit development conditional use permanent preliminary plat number 292025 00592 according to the conditions of the staff report. >> Do we have a second? >> A second. >> See this is why my hand is always on the button. So back and forth. All right. Everybody uh in favor say I. I. >> Anybody oppose? Say nay. >> All right. Congratulations. It's going to go to city council March 11thish. 11thish. It's a Wednesday. Okay. Our next project is the public safety campus amended site and building plan project number 16-2026-00609 and again it is Eric whenever you're ready. >> Thank you chair. The city of Woodbury has uh been working on a public safety campus project. I trust the planning commission has heard about that. In fact, previously our public safety command staff was in front of the planning commission during the um sales tax conversation, but the application in front of you this evening is for an expansion and renovation of the existing public safety building located off of Radio Drive. The city is proposing that remodel to create a uniform fire, EMS, and police services facility to meet the current and future needs of the community. The property is currently zoned city center district and is guided as public semi-public on the land use plan. Our the existing public safety building was constructed in 1975. it has not been uh the last renovation was in 2010 and since that time the city has grown by approximately 20,000 residents. In November of 2024 there was a sales tax that was approved by the voters as part of this project. that sales tax identified 50 million in f in uh funding that could be used for this project uh over a 20year duration maximum of 20-year duration. The project is slated to begin construction in the spring of 2026. It would ultimately create an approximately 100,000 square foot public safety campus building. It would include from a fire standpoint the addition of a new multi-story fire wing on the south side or left hand side as you look at this graphic would include new fire bay doors for faster deployment than what we're currently seeing. Uh an advanced what's called a hot zone. This is a decontamination area that's going to protect our uh public safety personnel from carcinogens and also significantly expand our 24-hour living. That's within that twotory portion of the structure. Those are for dorm space for our 24-hour firefighters for both existing and future staff. on the police side which is on the right hand side of the site plan or the northern portion. It would be a remodel of the existing facility. It's really uh adding additional functionality to the space. Also adding dedicated suites for the K9 programs as well as drone private interview rooms. um space for the dynamic aspects of our public safety department which includes um mental health professionals as well as social workers and also a expanded and secured evidence processing portion of the building. The graphic on the screen shows the existing building footprint and how it's going to grow to the south. In the end, this is a very long building. Um, but it um was designed um carefully to break up that long elevations with multiple plane changes. As we look at the site access, we'll see two access points. Site access A is designed as a 3/4er access. It's designed to provide access to the employee and in training room areas as well as access to the visitor parking spaces. Access point B is a full signalized. That's an existing signalized intersection that shares with Central Park. That's going to provide access to the appar fire apparatus bay or fire station. The visitor parking area to the north. There's a one-way drive that you can see on the screen that would access that portion. And then also the the rear of the building where there's additional parking and access to the parking garage which is right in this location. As we take a look at the building architecture, we'll notice the strong presence of the the brick and stone that's currently found on the portion of the building that will remain. That's this training area that will remain as part of the development. So, continued use of that brick and stone as well as a significant amount of clear story glass to add natural light into the space. I previously mentioned the twotory element for the fire area. This is that dormatory space. That's the twotory. So, as you can see, there was a number of different purposeful changes in materials to try to break up the significant length of this building. The bottom of this elevation shows the rear of the building. That's again using some brick and metal panels within that location. Few other locations uh views points from Radio Drive as well as the area on the northern portion of the building. The this is the southern on the bottom of the screen is the south access point. This would be the new fire station and again that two-story dormatory area. Parking for the site is provided by four specific areas. The public parking area is identified within parking area B. That's for day-to-day public events, trainings, other and staff parking will occur in parking area A. That is a gated parking area, but during events that would be a managed gate situation, but it would be a secured parking location for the majority of the time. There's also a gated area on the on the southern portion of the site that would then ultimately gated access to staff parking in parking area C and D. The zoning ordinance does not identify parking requirements for municipal buildings. So, the architect team and public safety staff looked at both current needs and future needs. You can see a number of dashed parking spaces. That's for future ability to add additional parking as demand is felt. With that, staff recommends approval of the amended site plan for the public safety campus project and staff is on hand for any questions. Okay. >> All right. Have we gotten any yellow slips or questions on teams? >> Not at this time, chair. >> All right. Q&A will stay open for the duration of the project discussion. If you have any questions, please enter them and staff will read them for the commission. And now we will open it up to our commissioners. And again, we are going to start with Commissioner Hallel. Thank you, Chair. Um, my question will be, will the um current public services relocate to other places during construction? >> Yeah, there will be a number of different services that will be displaced throughout the community. Some services will be at our fire stations. um day-to-day public safety needs of the community will be here at city hall. There'll be public safety personnel pos uh staffing city hall for that use. Um but yes, there will be a number of different areas there. There is a project page that has been created for the public safety campus project and there's additional information depending on the service that the public might be looking at and where that would be located. >> Okay. Now another question I have is how will the business does I mean uh uh building design complement the nearby area uh central park or any other areas >> that was a careful consideration as part of the design elements and the graphics on the screen show some of the areas you can see some of the roof designs and some of the glass entryways that are similar to some of the roof designs that are on the newly remodeled central park space the use of the lime stone uh which is the more buff color or yellow color on the screen and the traditional brown brick are a tie to the city hall building that we're in right now but also to the Kowalsskis project uh grocery store within close proximity. So a lot of the roof lines that are being proposed were intended to tie into the overall city center. >> I have no further questions. >> All right. Thank you, Commissioner Gentiel. Thank you, chair. Uh, could you go to the site access? Oh, you read my notes. Um, curious more so on the 11 visitor stalls. It seems why an access point B is needed and a long drive approach all the way across the face of the building just to have a lighted entrance to get to the 11 stalls. So just curious thought process when as you dive deeper into the plans it actually you know entrance A shows the turn radius and gets there. Just curious if there's a value management scenario that that might be an option to to cut. Yeah, there was a lot of discussion regarding the one-way drive aisle and the need for that. Um this radio drive is a county road and so they have um significant review authority as part of the design. They were very strong in the want to have a uh this one-way drive movement so that northbound movements could access the site via that system versus making a Uturn at Valley Creek and radio. That is the significant concern that they had for those northbound movements on radio that would not be able to access the site. So they were that was the the main difference especially during the peak time. It was a strong strong recommendation from the Washington County staff. >> Sounds like a great little road to put in. Perfect. No further questions. Chair. >> All right. Commissioner Kennedy. Thank you, chair. Um, Commissioner Gentiel and I were at the academy on Thursday and they are so excited about this building. They're just they just glowed when they talked about it. They're they can hardly wait. Um, I just had a couple of quick questions. Wanos, I I know I'm reading it wrong, but I couldn't I didn't see an elevator on the second for the second level. Did they Is that in the plans? >> Yes, it is. >> Okay. I figured it had to be, but I just I just didn't see it. Um and um actually um Commissioner Gentiel took my other question. That's all. Chair. >> Commissioner Sha. >> Thank you, Chair. Um this my question is actually more of a clarification. If you can go to the the A and B entrance part um side access. Great. So the bee I you know it's really good to actually see that uh you know it's been a you know an issue for Woodbury for a while which is how the fire engines leave that site and go without actually having a signal you know signalized intersection. So that's great. My my question is actually more for so that covers the the fire engines and and and the fire base straight facing the exit. uh how do the uh police actually exit this site? >> So they would be able to access the site via access point A. A number of public safety officer standpoint do park within the rear of the building. So there's two locations that are uh patrol. They would either be in the north staff parking area or they would be in the rear of the building. So depending on where they were parked, they would either utilize access point B. >> Okay. >> Or they would be uh accessing utiliz utilizing access point A. >> All right. Thank you. And I had >> it's important sorry chair. It's important to note that um police are not also being dispatched or they're not responding to calls directly from the facility. Typically speaking, they're not >> Yeah. >> directly from this facility. The concern is EMS and fire, >> right? Um the second question is um is actually kind of related to, you know, a sister facility, the hero center. Um, are there any things that that actually are currently what the Hero Center is actually used for for Cottage Grove and and Woodbury public safety and and fire uh that actually, you know, get now done at this site? >> Maybe council member Morris might be able to answer that better than I. I don't think there's any. >> There's not. And very specifically because of the hero center. So, if you were to think about uh training facilities or training um capabilities that we would have needed to included have included in this facility because the hero center is is primary for Cottage Grove and Woodbury. We don't have to have that shooting range, EMS, um access training, etc. That's all done at the Hero Center. So, we largely the training room is essentially is a large meeting room. There are very few training elements part of this, but that's specifically otherwise we would have been out of room at this on this site. We wouldn't have we wouldn't be looking at this because we we'd have been out of room. >> I just asked the question because I saw some K9, you know, areas specifically in the new >> facility and and drone, you know, stuff which is what I am very familiar with what existed the hero center. So, >> or or lack of. So, the K9 facility will be a shower for the K9 or a a bathtub for the K9. The drone has not been approved by the council as a capital investment yet. So, I think the infrastructure is will be built, but the actual drone units are not included in this. Um, the other part, the lockers and some medication, some secured facilities for that kind of stuff will be included in this. Notably as part of the uh option the three or four additional items is particular a particular piece of equipment that we would not have been able to house in this in this facility because the door or the roof wasn't high enough. Eric, is that right? That's right. >> But we were able not we staff was able to get the the bids to include that. So now there will be all all of our public safety equipment will be able to fit in this facility. >> Thank you. That's all I had. Chair, thank you, >> Commissioner Guzzik. >> Thank you, Chair. Uh, no questions. Thank you. >> I just had two questions on page six with the parking. Does the 43 stalls include the additional available parking that you talked about in the the paragraph above? >> It does not. >> Okay. So, there could be even more. And that's been scouted out. Proof of parking, etc. Okay. >> Question. Well, question comment on L-102. Can you talk to me about this guillotine style vertical pivot gate? Why are we doing a vertical pivot gate instead of a sliding gate? What's the advantage there? >> I can This is how cool my life is. I can't answer that. The I the concern is is why there's a guillotine style is so that there is two separate gate mechanisms so that if one were to fail, you would still be able to access the facility. So that's why the alternate gate style is utilized versus a sliding full gate that blocks both lanes of traffic. >> Sorry, I'm not understanding what what do you mean? Um if one fails, >> so there's two separate gate entities within this location. So, two separate mechanisms to open so that if one if let's just say the south lane. >> Oh, so guillotines. >> Yes. >> Okay. >> Yep. There's two movement two moving parts instead of one. >> Gotcha. Okay. >> It also looks like there's not enough access for the slide gates to go north or south with the future. >> Maybe. >> Yeah. >> That picture is wild. The parking would have also if those would have been installed, but the the safety concern from our public safety team was if there was a malf malfunction, they would still be able to open one of those gates likely. >> Gotcha. >> Encourage the public safety team to not take the vehicles off road. >> So, yes. >> Gotcha. All right. Do we have any other questions from any other commissioners? Any other comments come in? Any yellow slips? >> All right, we're looking for a motion. Who wants to do it? >> Motion to approve public safety campus project amended site and building plan 16-202600609. >> Do we have a second? >> I can second it. >> All in favor say I. >> I. >> I. I. >> I. All post say nay. >> All right. Looks like we're getting a new public safety building. Honor about May 11th. >> Honor about May 11th. >> All right. Next, we have council member Steve Morris to give our council report. >> Eric buried the lead in the public safety building. >> The lead the lead is that the bids have all come in and substantially under budget. um 59.3 million on at one point staff was prepping council for a 65 64 million 68 million and higher and and we were throwing fits but bids have come in um on the mar on Wednesday's council meeting this project will be in front of the council as well as the u assumption the following u item on the agenda is the approval of the bids u so it's all in the packet so it's it's public knowledge 59.3 3 million with all three or four three or four four alternative um ads that we wanted but didn't know didn't weren't sure we were going to get to Eric remember the I remember the door for the armored unit was one geothermal was one solar array was the third what's the fourth the door biffold doors >> correct >> yeah so the biffold doors going sideways instead of up which actually I think are faster and better on maintenance. All of those are meant to either save the city R&M on and M costs and R&M costs um and or use prepare the facility for well its useful life. It we'll get everything out of it and we can put all the vehicles in it which is important since we have a shiny new fire truck to put in there too. >> Course, are you using the geothermal for the snow melt as well on the sidewalks? >> Yes, correct. in the front in the front of the apparatus space. >> We were very excited about that. That's every motan dreams of that in their driveway and sidewalks. >> Um I'd do it everywhere if I I possibly could. Um it's a very very busy week for council in the city this week. Um tomorrow is uh the we have a grand opening of Slick City, which is a business. It's been highly anticipated here in the community that it's not just for kids, I'm told. So, adults are allowed to slide down the slides. I will you'll see a video of me doing that one way or the other whether it's approved or not here or there. On Wednesday, we have u a housing diversity meeting um at 3:00 with our legislators. Correct. Meeting with our leg our state legislation on housing diversity and our housing programs and our positions. Uh that's at 3:00. And then of course we have the uh council meeting um that afternoon or that evening as well on th and then on Thursday we have the mayor's state of the city address at Central Park at 6:30. So all are welcome to join that will be um live in person and taped and replayed on the city's channels um after that. Other than that we will see everybody on the second. That's all I have for you. >> And I have good news. We will not see each other on the second. That meeting has been cancelled. >> Okay. >> I just had a question. So, is the um the public safety project going to the city council uh this Wednesday? And so, but planning commission is not going there, correct? >> To present. Uh >> I'm next at February. Yep. >> All right. Great. Thank you. All right. Next, we have the approval of the minutes from the February 2nd, 2026 meeting. Anybody have comments or edits? >> Actually, I do. Um, under roll call, my name is spelled wrong. It's with two Y's. I have only one. >> Apologies. Does anybody else have anything? Thomas Harrington, what is listed as roll call and on each of the motions? >> Pick that up. >> You'd be surprised. >> Tom Harrington's listed in the roll call >> in the motions. >> Yep. >> Anybody else? >> All right. Anybody want to make a motion for approval? >> I I make a motion for approval of the uh planning commission meeting minutes February 2nd uh with the change uh in the spelling of uh the commissioner here >> and removing Thomas Harrington. >> Sorry. >> And removing Thomas Harrington. And we are Oh yeah and we are removing Thomas Harrington from it also. >> Do we have a second? >> Second. I second. >> All in favor say I. >> I. >> All say nay. >> All right. We are adjourned.